[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Sep 25 20:36:48 CEST 2006
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:43:40AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> if we are lucky, this time next year, you will be able to verify an X.509 > >> certificate chain with rfc 3779 resource extensions, and have significant > >> confidence in rights to address and asn resources. > > > > As I can understand, I can verify origin of prefix, prefix itself, but > > it can't authorize is that certain as-path legitimate or not. Like I can > > figure it out from routing registry DB. Isn't it? > > the current work will provide a formally verifiable demonstration of > ownership of address space. wow... address ownership. thats kind of a new concept. last i checked, most RIRs deal with the concept of address stewardship. does that mean i can assert ownership of integers and the RIR system will back me up? > one first useful step for an isp is to use the x.509 data to verify > ownership assertions in the irr when building filter lists, for > example. > randy --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]