[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Tue Sep 19 16:51:15 CEST 2006
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Max Tulyev wrote: > Dmitry Kiselev wrote: >> Max, how say that fees will be equal? As for me, PI/24+ASN should have >> yearly fee acceptable for most small companies. If they really need it, >> they will pay for it. Once payments stoped - resources returned and >> ready to reassignment. > > Seems to be very reasonable. For example, as it was a long before. Once payment stops resources are not returned (as far as my example shows below). See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ncc-services-wg/2004/msg00100.html for an example I've been tracking for 5 years now (company bankrupt). ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/membership/alloclist.txt shows the following still: il.doarnet DoarNet Ltd. 19981211 212.77.128/19 ALLOCATED PA So in theory your idea sounds nice. In practice it doesn't work. Regards, -Hank Nussbacher http://www.interall.co.il
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]