[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Mon Sep 18 18:52:37 CEST 2006
Hi Jeroen, On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:33:54 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > (who indeed would like to see a scheme like sBGP deployed :) The sBGP will consume _significantly_ more resources in the network for even a small amount of sBGP prefixes than PI will consume ever. Crypto Algos require a lot of computational power on conventional CPU's, the very huge majority of backbone routers has no special crypto hardware on board. _If_ sBGB should be implemented, I do sugest to make the BGP PI-friendly (e.g. separation of prefix and AS attributes) in the same step, as sBGB will require an router hardware and software update anyway. Best Regards Oliver Bartels Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]