[address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Camilleri
stefan.camilleri at maltanet.net
Thu Jun 15 14:08:18 CEST 2006
Oh I could do that. But then... What the hell are policies for anyway! That's the scope of this thread really. Policies are, or should be, a good thing. Otherwise they are just a bad joke. Is that what RIRs want? Fine. Stefan > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of > Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com > Sent: Il-Ħamis, 15 ta' Ġunju 2006 12:32 > To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] > 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and > Assignment Policy) > > > That is why trying to put a 'marketing' plan TODAY for 200 /48's > > within 2 years is kidding ourselves. > > No, it's kidding RIPE. And since that is exactly what RIPE > asked for in their policy, go do it, get your IPv6 > allocation, and quit complaining about your inability to > write an accurate plan. The policy document does not specify > that your plan will be checked for accuracy after 2 years. > > Still, I don't see why there needs to be any limits at all or > any specific numbers in a plan. > If someone wants to become an IPv6 LIR, just give them a /32 > with no questions asked. RIPE should only need to scrutinize > requests for shorter prefixes. > > --Michael Dillon >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2006-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]