[address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Mon Jan 16 17:46:22 CET 2006
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:26:50 +0000, "Tim Streater" > Notwithstanding this, there is some pressure in the research community > for v6 to be available. And this translates downwards, at least for me, > into a requirement to get some PI v6 space for a transit network. Your organisation shouldn't have a problem getting adsress-space It is in everyone's best interest to get as many people as possible from the research community involved. > > IPv6 is supposed to be an available and operational service, really? > in which > case the policy should cover all reasonable requirements. If it is not > the case (i.e., not an operational or available service), but is still > considered to be under development, not yet needed to be deployed, might > need to be changed to introduce geographical addressing, or whatever > else, then presumably this needs to be made evident and debated in a > different forum. I don't disagree, but: * The current policy will work just fine combined with a production-quality shim6 implementation, complete with full support for traffic-engineering and load-balancing from all vendors. I believe that still is a few years down the road. * Current policies and current v6 technology does not meet requirements from important groups like content providers wrt multi-homing and provider-independence. V6 could make a great p2p network if v6 can help eliminate NAT though ;) To me this mean there's a conflict here. Not only do people disagree wrt how things should be done, but also about what they want to achieve. //per -- Per Heldal http://heldal.eml.cc/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]