[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Dec 20 20:11:40 CET 2006
Hi Dmitry, On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: [...] > In my opinion AW can be auto-rised to almost match most "popular" > assignments sizes. All further risings(lowers) can be done upon LIR > request. If stats does not show clear peak - AW size can be aligned > to nearest bigest value. I am not sure I understand what you are proposing. Are you suggesting that all assignment approvals should trigger an AW raise? That is, if my LIR has an AW of /23 and I receive approval to make a /22 assignment I should automatically have my AW set at /22. Thanks, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]