[address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Aug 23 22:05:29 CEST 2006
Garry Glendown wrote > There is a possibility of people being tight on memory and filtering > something like /24 or /23, and then not being able to reach or be > reached by a /24 PI, because they also neglected to have a default route > to their uplink ... Apart from that, I have not been informed of any > problems with /24 or larger PI networks ... > I got near hundred of PIs for my clients at almost all RIPE region, and never hear about any problems with reachability. So it is just scare tale in fact ;) > But then, RIPE policies would allow for (or even enforce) PI networks > smaller than /24 to be assigned - which will most likely NOT be > reachable from the Internet ... > It is very simple: don't ask PI smaller /24 if you want to announce it worldwide. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal for change to the IPv4 PI allocation policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]