[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at hovland.cx
Wed Oct 5 14:58:58 CEST 2005
----- Original Message ----- From: "leo vegoda" <leo at ripe.net> > I apologise if this is moot, but an answer would really be appreciated. > This becomes a problem with private users as it already is today. We > can't store data about every single private user into a public database, > and there might also be issues regarding the privacy act. It breaks the > "true spirit of IPv6"; "have enough addresses, and no questions asked". >Would there be any real value in registering private users in Whois? How >likely is it that the end user could provide assistance to whoever >contacted them? So I can internally allocate 10 IPv6 addresses from our RIPE allocated /64, "IPv6 customer DSL pool", and give it to the private customer? I don't have to assign the customer itself a direct allocation? Thank you for your input. Joergen Hovland
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]