[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
joao-ripe at c-l-i.net
Thu Mar 24 15:14:55 CET 2005
On 24 Mar, 2005, at 15:10, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 24-mrt-05, at 15:06, Joao Damas wrote: > >> Regarding the issue of flap damp(en)ing parameters, I think we should >> really revisit the flap damp(en)ing recommendations again at RIPE 50. > > It should happen before doing anything with regard to this proposal, > though. And what kind of changes do you imagine? OH, that would be for the wg to discuss, but perhaps deprecation would be amongst the possibilities that need consideration > >> PS: regarding entries in the routing table and the pollution it >> causes, keep an eye on RFCs coming soon. > > Do you have the draft names? That saves me the waiting. :-) > In this case it would not, really :) You will have to be a bit patient. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]