[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Wed Dec 7 12:17:20 CET 2005
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:32:20 +0000, Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com said: [snip] > Of course, this means that RIRs and ISPs have to cooperate in > allocating IPv6 addresses using a rough kind of geographical > plan. I suggest that this plan be anchored to the major cities > where most interconnecting is done. This is also roughly aligned > with the topology of the network if you can manage to visualize > an entire city (Paris, London, Hannover, Krivoy Rog) as a single > node in a network. It's that level of abstraction that leads to > making sense of this kind of aggregation. ... and free transit into each geographical region would be mandatory ??? Aggregation across multiple administrative domains isn't just a minor technical change. It would eliminate the transit-provider business model. Disruptive technologies are facts of life and nobody has a god-given right to existence, but don't expect long-haul carriers to give up their business without a fight. //per -- Per Heldal heldal at eml.cc
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: 200 customer requirements for IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]