[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Dec 1 09:11:48 CET 2005
On 30 nov 2005, at 17.16, Daniel Roesen wrote: > ISPs do exist for customers, not customers do exist to feed ISPs > in the > most convenient way for the ISPs. Some folks seem to forget that, > looking at all the discussion trying to ignore the demand for real > multihoming (and that includes TE and network-wide routing policy > implementation, neither being delivered by things like shim6). I think you are contradicting yourself here. Shim6 does give the end- user TE capability. It does not give the ISP the possibility to ignore it, as they could today. I am not sure what you mean with "network-wide routing policy implementation".... I have still to figure out what the "real multihoming" thing is, but I am sure it must be beautiful. > HOW the requirements are being delivered is another topic. multi6 has > resulted in the decision to ignore many critical requirements. We're > just asking for something that delivers on the targets. Wasting time > with half-solutions is not productive. Halting any development because > the magic bullet wasn't found yet ain't either. If you have alternative ideas you know how it works - send text. - kurtis -
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]