[address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Tue Apr 5 09:51:11 CEST 2005
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 13:48 -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > i have plonked all mail from vianetworks.co.uk. if they ever get > a clue and have something useful to say, someone please tell me. Ah, thus I was not the only one getting those silly "you are spamming" replies, then again if you look at their Bayesian filter: > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > > 1.0 RCVD_FROM_SECONDARY Went through secondary MX record > > 0.1 TW_VT BODY: Odd Letter Triples with VT > > 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% > > [score: 1.0000] > > -0.4 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment Indeed... those folks will not get much mail. I mean if this ML result in 99% spam probability, ouch ;) Greets, Jeroen (And yes, I already send a message to address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net and also one to ops at ripe.net with the content that they might want to throw that subscriber from the list...) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20050405/b43e2bbc/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [Ticket #1032183] Autoreply: viadomains <bleep>
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]