Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sat Jan 10 17:25:31 CET 2004
Hi, On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:53:33AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > > From my observation on this discussion there seem to be no other parties > > beside TLD operators that are currently so much interested in setting up > > anycast services. At least, nobody said so on this list. > > i have deployed non-dns anycast services a number of times in the last > decade. next. In case you didn't notice, the internet grew somewhat over the last decade. Add to that the addition of v6 glue to some xTLD name server sets and you get a conflict between the number of DNS servers that you want to deploy, and the number of glue records that fit into the packets. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]