[address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks

On Wednesday 25 February 2004 14:19, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>
> on re-reading this message this morning I realise that its tone was a
> bit inappropriate.  My only excuse is the serious abuse I have been
> exposed to in private messages since I posted this draft.  It looks like
> a lot of people take me personally responsible for out-dated bogon
> filters I have no responsibility for whatsoever. Once again, apologies
> for the tone of voice.
>
> The message remains: If you want the RIRs to do the pro-active testing
> and notofocation that I propose you will have to make your voice heared
> to them, just as you have to make your voice heared if you believe they
> should not do this.
>

No worries, tone was fine by me :) and I can see no reason as to why people 
should send you any abuse.
The question is a valid question - should more proactive notification be 
something that the RIR's do or not ?.

Regards,
Jon