Re: PI & 1st allocation policy
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 15:50:26 +0200
- Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> So, you say we remove the 25% requirement? I am not against this,
> actually I think it's good.
I think that there is less value in a barrier to entry if the
minimum initial allocation size is smaller. I doubt the overhead
of checking that each requester meets the 25% barrier would be
equal to the value of the work.
> However, if we are to implement 3. I think
> we need an exception rule like APNIC have, that the NCC can give out
> routable /24s for important infrastructure (read root-servers).
I can see the value in a policy for root DNS servers. However, all
three root servers operating in our region have address space.
> > ASN assignments: 599
> > Allocation: 377
> > PI Assignments: 408
> 100 ASNs a month, that is quite a lot. Do you have any data on how many
> of those received initial allocations as well?
I don't have those stats to hand. However, I can give you details of
the numbers of /20s allocated per month for the same period:
I hope that's useful.
Registration Services Manager