<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

AW: ENUM trials in general

  • To: "Jim Reid" < >
  • From: "Stastny Richard" < >
  • Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:25:43 +0100

Hi Jim,

	-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
	Von: Jim Reid [
] Gesendet: Di 25.02.2003 14:14 An: Stastny Richard Cc: Sabine Dolderer/Denic; Michael Haberler; axel.pawlik@localhost carsten@localhost daniel.karrenberg@localhost enum-trials@localhost marco.bernardi@localhost richard@localhost Betreff: Re: ENUM trials in general I am not convinced of the need for whois (either in general or for ENUM in particular). There is general consensus within the UK ENUM Group that a whois functionality is neither necessary nor desirable. I suppose this could change in light of experience gained during the trial. Maybe you missed my citation about TS 102 172 For ENUM, I think that ultimately DNS hosting will be done by the telco or equivalent entity that's responsible for some number block. Huh? Now it seems you missed at lot of the recent discussion. In UK you have numberblocks hosted by telcos, interesting, especially all the big ported single number blocks. regards Richard If that's true, this entity can be the initial point of contact for any DNS technical issues which crop up. I wonder how often whois gets genuinely used for that purpose today? And for ENUM, there will be cases where people will want to register a domain and NOT have a whois entry at all: an unlisted phone number perhaps. I believe that some regulators can get uptight about providing a reverse lookup capability on telephone numbers.

  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>