Re: [anti-spam] [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
-
To: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@localhost, rubaduk@localhost
-
From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" Woeber@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:02:58 +0000
-
Organization: UniVie - ACOnet
-
Reply-to: Woeber@localhost
Brian Nisbet wrote:
> Michele,
>
> The query is over the abuse details they have listed in both
> the RIPE database and places like abuse.net, rather than phone
> or postal details.
>
> That aside, however, currently there is no policy or procedures
> for RIPE to follow up on incorrect contact information in the
> database.
[...]
Nevertheless I have to comment that I perceive it as perversion
to explicitely and voluntarily register or maintain an abuse-mailbox:
attribute that points to a disfunct mail delivery point...
[...]
> a rehashing of the discussion from last year is unlikely to be
> helpful without some new input.
[...]
So, one of the ideas I am having right now - as this attribute is
not mandatory and pretty modern - is to develop a slightly more
formal procedure to apply to this attribute.
Wilfried.
