Open Source WG Chair Selection Process

1. Number of Co-Chairs and Terms

The Open Source WG will have two or three co-chairs. Each chair serves a
three-year term. Terms must be staggered to ensure continuity (with
three co-chairs, no more than two terms may end in the same year). If
staggering is lost due to a resignation or unexpected changes, the WG may
define a different term length to restore staggering.

2. Chair Requirements

A candidate for co-chair must meet the following requirements:

2.1 The candidate has attended more than one RIPE Meeting in person and
is familiar with RIPE processes and community expectations (e.g. by
having studied the RIPE guide for new working group chairs and
completing the RIPE NCC Academy working group chair course).

2.2. The candidate commits to attending as many RIPE Meetings as
possible in person while serving as co-chair.

2.3. The candidate will attend the upcoming RIPE Meeting (either in
person or online) where the selection process will take place.

3. Call for Chair Candidates

Two months before every autumn RIPE meeting, those chair(s) whose term
does not end (the remaining chairs) will issue a call for candidates for
any position with a term ending that year. The nomination period will be 21
days. Candidates must confirm that they satisfy the requirements listed
in section 2 above.

Volunteers are asked to contact the remaining WG chairs directly
("off-list"). An incumbent follows the same process.

4. Selection Process

4.1. The remaining WG chairs announce all candidates to the list at the
same time, after which all candidates have a chance to introduce
themselves (in writing) to the working group. The remaining WG chairs
will then ask the WG for feedback (ideally substantive feedback will be
provided about why a candidate is being supported).

4.2. The remaining WG chairs evaluate the feedback and determine the
candidate who received the most support. They then announce that candidate
during the next RIPE Meeting so that the WG can give final approval.

4.3. If the WG and the WG chairs cannot clearly determine the preferred
candidate,
the RIPE Chair Team makes the final decision.

4.4. In any case, the RIPE Chair Team will oversee the process and
formally confirm that it has been followed properly.

5. Issues Not Covered

Any issues not covered here will be decided by WG consensus during a
RIPE Meeting. When the WG is unable to reach consensus, the matter will
be referred to the RIPE Chair Team, whose decision shall be final.