[asn32] Re: RPSL support for 32 bit ASN
Fri Aug 18 16:08:29 CEST 2006
Denis Walker wrote: >> It would seem sensible to follow the draft rather than create >> confusion by trying something different. Of course some implements may >> not have a bounds check on the max size of an AS number. > > But they may consider it to be an integer and the new syntax will be x.y. I should have made it clearer that the two comments were separate. I think that it would be best to reflect the usage in the draft but it might also be the case that the current software would "support" a single integer purely because the size of the number wasn't checked. Mark.
[ rpslng Archive ]