Archived Policy Proposals
The policy proposals on this page have been archived. You can see at a glance if they were accepted and adopted by the RIPE community or withdrawn at any stage.
Name | Status | Proposal Number | Working Group | Date Archived |
Language Clarification for “Allocating/Assigning Resources to the RIPE NCC” |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-11 | Address Policy Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: This proposal clarified the language in the RIPE Document “Allocating/Assigning Resources to the RIPE NCC”. |
||||
Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region” |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-10 | Address Policy Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: This proposal clarified the language in the RIPE Document “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”. |
||||
Language Clarification in “Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region” |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-08 | Address Policy Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: This proposal clarified the language in the RIPE Document "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region" |
||||
Language Clarification in “IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region” |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-07 | Address Policy Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: This proposal clarified the language in the RIPE Document "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" |
||||
Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Legacy Internet Resource Holders |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-06 | RIPE NCC Services Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: This proposal requested the RIPE NCC to publish the link between legacy holders and their sponsoring LIR. |
||||
Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-05 | Address Policy Working Group | April 2015 |
Summary: This proposal allowed the transfer of Internet number resources between a resource holder within the RIPE NCC service region and a resource holder within the region of another another Regional Internet Registry (RIR). |
||||
Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8 |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-04 | Address Policy Working Group | March 2015 |
Summary: In order to receive an allocation from the final /8, LIRs were required to have received an IPv6 allocation. This proposal removed this requirement. |
||||
Language Clarification in “IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Points” |
WITHDRAWN
|
2014-09 | Address Policy Working Group | November 2014 |
Summary: This proposal aims to clarify the language in the RIPE Document “IPv6 Address Space Policy For Internet Exchange Points”. |
||||
Allow IPv4 PI transfer |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-02 | Address Policy Working Group | September 2014 |
Summary: This proposal allowed to transfer IPv4 Provider Independent (PI) assignments. |
||||
Abandoning the Minimum Allocation Size for IPv4 |
ACCEPTED
|
2014-01 | Address Policy Working Group | July 2014 |
Summary: Abandonment of the Minimum (Sub-) Allocation Size concept in the "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" document, currently ripe-606. |