News and Announcements

23 July 1999 Esther Dyson Chair ICANN Interim Board Dear Ms Dyson, We have pleasure in submitting to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) the attached proposal relating to the formation of an ICANN Address Supporting Organization (ASO). This proposal is being submitted to

Amsterdam, The Netherlands -- 8 July 1999 The Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC), the American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN), and the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) have published today a collectively developed policy draft describing the Address Supp

Esther Dyson Chair ICANN Interim Board Date: 2 July 1999 Dear Ms Dyson, We have pleasure in submitting to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) the attached proposal relating to the formation of an ICANN Address Supporting Organization (ASO). This proposal is being subm

ICANN Address Supporting Organization 1. Definition of the ASO. a. Purpose. The Address Supporting Organization (ASO) will be a consensus-based advisory body within the ICANN framework. b. Components. The ASO will establish an "Address Council" and host an annual open meeting (known as the "General

From: Geoff Huston <gih@localhost > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:57:09 +1100 Cc: gih@localhost Here is a write up of the slide pack that was delivered at theSingapore ASO meeting. As I understand it (I was not in attendance)the Minneapolis ASO meeting did not make any substantive changesin outlook or

Apricot'99 AUDIENCE Distribution of these minutes is unlimited. STATUS RELEASEATTENDEES Name Address Speaker Paul Gampe paulg@apnic.net Anne Lord anne@apnic.net Mirjam Kuehne mir@ripe.net Frederico Neves freves@aswp.

The three current Regional Internet Address Registries: APNIC, ARIN and RIPE NCC are working hard to prepare a proposal for the recognition of the Address Supporting Organisation (ASO) mentioned in the ICANN bylaws. Your input and/or comments are welcome. The following letter has been sent by th

In June 1998, the Executive Boards and Councils of each of the current Regional Internet Registries (APNIC, ARIN and RIPE NCC) reviewed the US Government White Paper at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/6_5_98dns.htm and welcomed it, especially the emphasis on self-administration for the I

RIPE NCC Statement

Position Statement of the existing Regional Internet Registries v1.024 July 1998SCOPEThis statement proposes structures and processes that address oneaspect of the 'New Corporation' proposed by, among others, the USGovernment 'White Paper' on Internet governance. In this statement werefer to this e