Archive: [email protected]/2002

All Archives / enum-trials / 2002 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• ENUM workshop possibly in conjunction with March ICANN meeting, Carsten Schiefner (04 December 2002)
• FW: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis-02.txt, Stastny Richard (26 November 2002)
• AW: FYI, Stastny Richard (20 November 2002)
• using ENUM for numbers poratbility, Andrew Bartosiewicz (05 November 2002)
  • Re: using ENUM for numbers poratbility, Richard Shockey (05 November 2002)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: using ENUM for numbers poratbility, Stastny Richard (05 November 2002)
• Panama blocks IP Telephony, Carsten Schiefner (04 November 2002)
  • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Mally Mclane (04 November 2002)
    • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Richard Shockey (04 November 2002)
      • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Lawrence Conroy (04 November 2002)
      • FYI, Mr A. Snell (19 November 2002)
      • Re: FYI, Carsten Schiefner (20 November 2002)
  • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Carsten Schiefner (27 November 2002)
    • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Mally Mclane (27 November 2002)
    • Re: Panama blocks IP Telephony, Carsten Schiefner (27 November 2002)
• RE: Comments on ENUM Minimum Requirements, Stastny Richard (24 October 2002)
  • RE: Comments on ENUM Minimum Requirements, Richard Shockey (24 October 2002)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Comments on ENUM Minimum Requirements, Rosbotham, Paul (25 October 2002)
  • RE: Comments on ENUM Minimum Requirements, Vincent Humphries (25 October 2002)
  • RE: Comments on ENUM Minimum Requirements, Stastny Richard (25 October 2002)
• DNSSEC, Stastny Richard (24 October 2002)
  • Re: DNSSEC, David Conrad (24 October 2002)
  • Re: DNSSEC, Jim Reid (24 October 2002)
• [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], axelm (24 October 2002)
  • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Jim Reid (24 October 2002)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Stastny Richard (24 October 2002)
    • RE: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Lawrence Conroy (24 October 2002)
      • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], David Conrad (24 October 2002)
      • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Patrik Fältström (24 October 2002)
      • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Jim Reid (24 October 2002)
      • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Lawrence Conroy (25 October 2002)
      • Re: [fwd: my comments to the SPAN list], Jim Reid (25 October 2002)
• ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Stastny Richard (23 October 2002)
  • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Jim Reid (23 October 2002)
    • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Richard Shockey (23 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, David Conrad (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Richard Shockey (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Jim Reid (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Richard Shockey (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Jim Reid (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Paul M. Kane (24 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Richard Shockey (25 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Marco Bernardi (25 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Jim Reid (25 October 2002)
      • Re: ETSI on Minimum Requirements for European ENUM Trials, Richard Shockey (25 October 2002)