You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > Mailman Archives
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>


  • To: "Mr A. Snell" < >
  • From: Carsten Schiefner < >
  • Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:47:42 +0100
  • Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Dear Adrian, all -

two things:

firstly, a question for clarification: SGA stands for, I guess, Study Group A. Of what organisation?

secondly and FYI, a link to an answer to the (negative) VoIP impact on phone number exhaustion, filed by some telcos.


Carsten Schiefner

Mr A. Snell wrote:
re : negating the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM !!

NANC TO ADDRESS VOIP IMPACT ON NANP ISSUES 'It's recommended that the NANC assist the FCC in addressing these numbering issues...' There is also an SGA contribution on Global ENUM TLD Evaluation heading to Geneva that specifically negates the global integrity of E.164 numbering resources in ENUM. Whatever the conflicts over billing issues, isn't there even the slightest risk of the service applications babies being thrown out with the legacy billing bath water?

  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>