Archive: [email protected]/2004

All Archives / anti-spam-wg / 2004 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• Jan Meijer
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spammer is Jailed in NYC (30 May 2004)
• Jon Lawrence
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spamhaus & ".mail" TLD (26 March 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (28 September 2004)
• Kurt Jaeger
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (09 January 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Germany, recent contacts (29 April 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (22 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (23 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (24 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (24 September 2004)
• Mally Mclane
  • [[email protected]] AOL implement SPF (23 January 2004)
  • [[email protected]] Operation 'Secure Your Server' (03 February 2004)
  • [an[email protected]] AOL raffles off a spammers siezed porsche.. (30 March 2004)
  • [[email protected]] European Spam Laws are 'meaningless' (28 April 2004)
  • [[email protected]] Spam Laws Confuse Businesses (07 May 2004)
  • [anti-spa[email protected]] Scott Richter Obtains Injunctions Against Spamcop (12 May 2004)
  • [[email protected]] Spammer is Jailed in NYC (28 May 2004)
  • [[email protected]] Italian Government Orders Mobile Operators To Send SMS Spam (14 June 2004)
  • [[email protected]] AOL Employee Charged With Stealing AOL Subscriber List And Selling It To Spammers (24 June 2004)
• MarcoH
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (23 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (27 September 2004)
• Markus Stumpf
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (09 January 2004)
  • Re: [ant[email protected]] DomainKeys: BusinessWeek article about Yahoo (15 January 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spamhaus & ".mail" TLD (27 March 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spamhaus & ".mail" TLD (01 April 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spamhaus & ".mail" TLD (01 April 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] European Spam Laws are 'meaningless' (28 April 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Antivirus bounces (10 May 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Anti-Spam measures (26 May 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (22 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] MARID to close (22 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (23 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (23 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (24 September 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (29 September 2004)
• Markus Werner
  • Re: [[email protected]] Antivirus bounces (11 May 2004)
• Martin Neitzel
  • Re: [[email protected]] European Spam Laws are 'meaningless' (29 April 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] European Spam Laws are 'meaningless' (29 April 2004)
• Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
  • RE: [[email protected]] Spamhaus & ".mail" TLD (01 April 2004)
• Niall O'Reilly
  • [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (07 January 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (07 January 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (08 January 2004)
  • Re: [[email protected]] Spam-RBL, anyone? (09 January 2004)
  • [[email protected]] Re: [db-wg] abuse-c (12 January 2004)
• Patrick Oonk
  • Re: [[email protected]] Abuse contacts in RIPE database and whois (24 September 2004)
• Paul Wouters
  • Re: [[email protected]] New spammer DNS trick (26 January 2004)