[routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Fri Jun 26 01:22:32 CEST 2020
Melchior Aelmans wrote on 24/06/2020 19:27: > Although I see your concerns I don't agree that 2019-08 changes RPKI > from "opt-in" to "no opt-out". In fact, 2019-08 gives you options to > "opt-in" in multiple ways and so gives you options to choose from. Network engineers see tools. Other people see big red buttons, itching to be pushed. There's no shortage of people wanting these buttons to be created, e.g. https://twitter.com/CarolineGreer/status/1268835511222894598 The further down this road we progress as a community towards making centralised black-holing via a single court order a feasible reality, the more difficult it will be to reverse out when we realise we've gone too far. I do not support the proposal for this reason. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]