[routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Route Flap Damping in the Wild?!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Hallgren
mh at xalto.net
Fri Jun 26 09:33:38 CEST 2020
Hi, 26 juin 2020 01:22 "Nick Hilliard" <nick at foobar.org> a écrit: > Melchior Aelmans wrote on 24/06/2020 19:27: > >> Although I see your concerns I don't agree that 2019-08 changes RPKI > from "opt-in" to "no >> opt-out". In fact, 2019-08 gives you options to > "opt-in" in multiple ways and so gives you >> options to choose from. > > Network engineers see tools. Other people see big red buttons, itching to be pushed. > > There's no shortage of people wanting these buttons to be created, e.g. > > https://twitter.com/CarolineGreer/status/1268835511222894598 > > The further down this road we progress as a community towards making centralised black-holing via a > single court order a feasible reality, the more difficult it will be to reverse out when we realise > we've gone too far. > > I do not support the proposal for this reason. > Same here: I don't support it, for the same reason. mh > Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] The dangers of demonizing bogons 2019-08 : (Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] Sanctions and the RIPE NCC: Status Update)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Route Flap Damping in the Wild?!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]