[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arjan van der Oest
Arjan.vanderOest at voiceworks.com
Wed Sep 14 12:57:15 CEST 2016
> On 14 Sep 2016, at 12:27, Silvan M. Gebhardt <gebhardt at openfactory.ch> wrote: > > yes but the IX assigns the Peering IP's in their subnet Allocation ;) > > so it would be "Price v4 and v6 peering ip's differently" I can't speak for other IX'es but at least AMS-IX charges for port-speed, not for volume of traffic neither type of traffic. And brutally honest: this is never going to change simply because it's not the role of an exchange. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Arjan van der Oest Lead Mobile Engineer Voiceworks BV - Oplagestraat 1 - 1321 NK Almere Mobile : +31 6 8686 0000 Office : +31 36 7606656 GPG key on http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Key fingerprint = C58F 55CA C62A 5A49 15E0 2271 3481 6020 997E EE99
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]