[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Silvan Gebhardt
gebhardt at openfactory.ch
Wed Sep 14 13:04:30 CEST 2016
I am totally aware of that. I replied to the technical possiblity after someone said that this would be impossible since IXes are L2 only ;) let's drop this thread sideline! and can we get rid of the <explicit words> ticket systems? I have in the meantime received 3 autoreplies directly to me, and 1 undeliverables I have received username and passwords for 2 ticket systems, and about 2 tickets are open for me WTF why do people subscribe their ticket systems if they have autoreplies on that address. At least with OTRS, I can set things to be on "swallow it but don't say anything" Silvan On 09/14/2016 12:57 PM, Arjan van der Oest wrote: > I can't speak for other IX'es but at least AMS-IX charges for port-speed, not for volume of traffic neither type of traffic. And brutally honest: this is never going to change simply because it's not the role of an exchange. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]