[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Gont
fgont at si6networks.com
Wed Nov 2 21:26:41 CET 2011
On 11/01/2011 02:41 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> Optional support: >> Revised ICMPv6 [RFC 5095] * > > This seems wrong. Its not a revised ICMP spec, it is deprecation of RH0. > Draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis marks its as mandatory, and I think you > should too. +1 RH0 should be disabled by default. >> *Mandatory support:* >> >> * >> >> MLDv2 snooping [RFC 4541] >> > * > This seems like an overkill for a consumer grade equipment (but I do > support it for the other types of switches) +1 Overly (and unnecessarily) complex for a consumer switch. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont at si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]