[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 501bis and some comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Nov 3 10:39:13 CET 2011
Hi On 2 nov. 2011, at 21:26, Fernando Gont wrote: > On 11/01/2011 02:41 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > >>> Optional support: >>> Revised ICMPv6 [RFC 5095] * >> >> This seems wrong. Its not a revised ICMP spec, it is deprecation of RH0. >> Draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis marks its as mandatory, and I think you >> should too. > > +1 > RH0 should be disabled by default. I agree. To quote Joe Abley: "RH0 is evil". - Job
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 501bis and some comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]