[ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Merike Kaeo
merike at doubleshotsecurity.com
Wed Nov 2 19:51:50 CET 2011
Hi. The authors agree here and the intent is to do a quick turnaround but to ensure we address the issues which we felt were important enough to resolve/incorporate. - merike On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Marco, > > Just to clarify (because I wrote the e-mail yesterday in a hurry): I think the 501 work is very important, there's a lot of demand for it, and we should get it done ASAP. The world appreciates RIPE and the guys doing this work. That being said, I do agree that some of the issues that me and Jouni raised probably should be fixed before final publication. I'm hopeful that it can be done relatively quickly. > > Jari > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Some comments on 501bis
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]