[dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Oct 18 12:59:58 CEST 2016
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 10:53, Antonio Prado <thinkofit at gmail.com> wrote: > > besides, I cannot fully understand how this WG could ask the NCC board > to investigate "if we have reason to believe the rfp was unfair or > defective in some way" when, actually, you just said "the contractual > terms are out of scope for the WG". Antonio, these are two different things. The WG does not concern itself with what’s in this contract or how the RFP was conducted. That’s operational/implementation detail. If the service provided by the contract or RFP went wrong in some way or if someone complains, that falls within the WG’s remit. We don’t need to have knowledge of the content of that contract (or the RFP) to raise questions whenever a problem arises. ie The WG could formulate a list of questions for the NCC management/board and ask them to look into the matter and report back. I hope this clarifies matters.
[ dns-wg Archives ]