This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Antonio Prado thinkofit at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 11:53:47 CEST 2016

On 10/18/16 11:36 AM, Jim Reid wrote:
> The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope for the WG

> if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective in some way.

> The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team.

jim,

I agree on your last sentence.

besides, I cannot fully understand how this WG could ask the NCC board
to investigate "if we have reason to believe the rfp was unfair or
defective in some way" when, actually, you just said "the contractual
terms are out of scope for the WG".

thank you
--
antonio

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]