[dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
Carsten Schiefner ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Oct 18 12:04:05 CEST 2016
Hi Jim, On 18.10.2016 11:36, Jim Reid wrote: > The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of > scope for the WG. This also applies to the RFP and NCC’s selection > procedure. what other forum you would see fit then for such kind of Q&A? > The WG should only intervene here -- ie by asking the NCC board to > investigate -- if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract > was unfair or defective in some way. For the record: I am not even only remotely insinuating this by any means at all - I am just a curious Internet Citizen in this regard. But as a side note: how would you come to believe that the RfP and/or contract is unfair or defective in some way, if neither one is disclosed? > The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team. Not that I have attempted this by any means, I think. Best, -C.
[ dns-wg Archives ]