Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute

• To:
• From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1993 13:52:12 +0100

  Hi Marten,

>To get back on this one once more, I think an omission IS a mismatch, and
>that is why a warning is generated right now. If you would have left the
>bdrygw-l in (an it would be the same) you would get no warning.

  thanks for still considering it!
  I'm getting the impression that we maybe could handle it by documenting 
  _how it actually_ works. Probably there is more important things to do than
  "fixing" this one in software?
  
  Cheers, Wilfried.

• Post To The List:

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute
    • From: Marten Terpstra