You are here: Home > Participate > Join a Discussion > Mailman Archives
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: thoughts on updates for obj with guarded attribute

  • To:
  • From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
  • Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1993 13:52:12 +0100

  Hi Marten,

>To get back on this one once more, I think an omission IS a mismatch, and
>that is why a warning is generated right now. If you would have left the
>bdrygw-l in (an it would be the same) you would get no warning.

  thanks for still considering it!
  I'm getting the impression that we maybe could handle it by documenting 
  _how it actually_ works. Probably there is more important things to do than
  "fixing" this one in software?
  Cheers, Wilfried.

  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>