<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse mouse@localhost
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:52 -0500 (EST)
>> One thing that might help would be for a RIR to themselves emit a >> route for any space assigned to them but currently not sub-assigned, >> a route which would blackhole the traffic. > Given that any more specific route out of that space announced by a > "black hat" would just overrule that blackhole route, the RIRs would > have to announce all the remaining address space as [tiny routes]. Mmm, true; the only way it would work would involve software updates "everywhere". Okay, not a good idea. Sorry for the noise. /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse@localhost / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
- [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: rubaduk
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: John Draper
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: peter h
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: der Mouse
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
- From: Gert Doering
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |