<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Jesus Sanz de las Heras <jesus.heras@localhost
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:40:16 +0200
- Organization: Red.es/RedIRIS
Using greylisting alone will be soon almost unuseful.Maybe, but it's stopping a lot of junk for us :)
DNSBL too block a lot of spam. Which could be the difference of using greylisting and DNSBL returning code errors "450 Service temporary unavailable" ??.
xxx@localhost (reason: 450 Service temporarily unavailable; Client host [206.46.170.173] temporarily blocked using bl.spamcop.net - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?206.46.170.173 It's a soft way to use DNSbl without collateral damage. Regards -- Jesús Sanz de las Heras RedIRIS
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Sabri Berisha
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Peter Dambier
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Paul Wouters
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
- [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Emanuele Balla
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Michele Neylon :: Blacknight.ie
- Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
- From: Esa Laitinen
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |