Re: Proposed EU Directive on Electronic Commerce
Hi!
> Ragnar Lonn said:
> >> What if they put in "money", but contained "sex" ? Or any other
> >> combination of distrustful advertisment ?
> > Yeah that's the risk you're running and which it may be wise not
> > to bother about all the keywords listed. But I don't think that using
> > "sex" as a keyword really helps more than using the appropriate one.
> Once you've got them within the umbrella of regulation at all, it's
> relatively easy to throw existing false advertising rules at them.
> For example, the Advertising Standards Authority would no doubt act against
> someone misleading in this way.
Sure. That's why I want spam to be banned completly -- wouldn't
it be easy to prosecute, if we did it like this 8-) ?
--
MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 21 years to go !
LF.net GmbH pi@localhost
Vor dem Lauch 23 fon +49 711 90074-23 Friedrich-Ebert-Str.1
D-70567 Stuttgart fax +49 711 7289041 40210 Duesseldorf fon +49 211 179253-11
For Redmond: "nuke the site from orbit-- it's the only way to be sure."
