[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 20:00:52 CEST 2013
The access side is about the largest adopter of whatever IP connectivity works for them wih a minimum of effort. So decisions will vary across providers, sure. On Friday, June 28, 2013, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an > I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up > new customers. > > > With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few > > years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any > effect, > There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access > side. I don't do access. > > -- > ciao, > Marco > -- --srs (iPad) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130628/1a9b7679/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]