[anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Jun 28 18:49:57 CEST 2013
On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up new customers. > With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few > years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any effect, There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access side. I don't do access. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20130628/a7db7ae7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Bye Bye
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]