[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Sun Nov 30 15:38:00 CET 2014
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > > Take a look at > > e.g. http://www.vix.at/vix_participants.html?&no_cache=1&L=1, the > > column "IPv6 Routeserver activated". > > > > I presume it wouldn't be useful to have that configured, unless there > > is deployment in these ASNs. > > with all due respect, wilfred. iij has had a backbone configiured for > ipv6 since 1997. but that is anecdote not data. > > Yep, data is much more useful. http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141130/7a255fa0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]