[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Nov 28 11:26:22 CET 2014
>>> Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: >>>> Easy. The current IPv6 deploy makes me cry like a little girl. NOBODY >>>> (as percentage) is deploying it in their customer/backone/whatever >>>> network. >>> ... even if stated again and again, it simply is not true. Please stop >>> these claims, they may be even more detrimental to IPv6 deployment, if >>> read by some people not having "real data" and/or first-hand >>> experience. >> perhaps a pointer to these real data would make your point > Take a look at > e.g. http://www.vix.at/vix_participants.html?&no_cache=1&L=1, the > column "IPv6 Routeserver activated". > > I presume it wouldn't be useful to have that configured, unless there > is deployment in these ASNs. with all due respect, wilfred. iij has had a backbone configiured for ipv6 since 1997. but that is anecdote not data. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]