[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Nov 18 12:32:02 CET 2014
Hello Wilfried, > In general, I would be much more in favour of a version of the proposal which removes > the IPV6 holdership or usage *completely*. For all the reasons that have been pointed > out already by others. (Thanks for that!). I fully agree. I will work with the authors and help them to update the proposal text. Cheers, Sander PS: yes, this means that I am involved in this policy proposal and I will abstain on all WG-chair related duties about this proposal as I have now clearly given up my neutrality on this :) Gert has agreed to decide on this proposal without my input.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-10 New Policy Proposal (Language Clarification in “IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers In The RIPE Region”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]