[address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 Decision to move to Last Call (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Sat Apr 7 06:09:10 CEST 2012
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Sascha Lenz wrote: > > >>[...] I only remember the >>ERX transfer project right now, which was a one-timer (IMHO), > > > Correct, > the goal was to rectify some artefacts, caused by (Internet-)History and > to move the registration data to the "correct" one of the 3 RIRs. Of course that should have been "one of the *5* RIRs"! Blush, Wilfried > The process was managed collectively by the RIRs, thus not on a voluntary > basis of a particular resource holder. > > And, there was no financial implication (in the sense of being compensated > or charged). > > >>but as usual i may be 100% wrong) > > > I guess not in this case :-) > > Wilfried >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 Decision to move to Last Call (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]