[address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Sat Apr 7 03:14:13 CEST 2012
Sascha Lenz wrote: > [...] I only remember the > ERX transfer project right now, which was a one-timer (IMHO), Correct, the goal was to rectify some artefacts, caused by (Internet-)History and to move the registration data to the "correct" one of the 3 RIRs. The process was managed collectively by the RIRs, thus not on a voluntary basis of a particular resource holder. And, there was no financial implication (in the sense of being compensated or charged). > but as usual i may be 100% wrong) I guess not in this case :-) Wilfried
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] On use of the word "sold" (was: 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers))
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]