[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Thu Jan 17 18:08:21 CET 2008
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 11:39 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > On Jan 17, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Per Heldal wrote: > > Should we allow PI to be used to provide transit? > > If not, would you as an ISP build your network using PI? > > > Is there an easy way to enforce people not doing it ? Maybe not today, but those who violate such terms have none other than themselves to blame if they later find themselves up sh*t creek without a paddle (ip-block) once the community has a decent mechanism to revoke allocations. //per
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]