[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu Jan 17 11:39:49 CET 2008
On Jan 17, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Per Heldal wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:47 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >> That was already clear, but if, as an end-user, I have to get a >> contract with the NCC to obtain PI space, there ain't much difference >> to becoming an LIR. There could be some difference in cost, but that >> would only mean that as a small ISP it might be cheaper to get PI >> space. >> > > Should we allow PI to be used to provide transit? > If not, would you as an ISP build your network using PI? Is there an easy way to enforce people not doing it ? -- MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]