[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Thu Jan 17 10:42:05 CET 2008
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:47 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > That was already clear, but if, as an end-user, I have to get a > contract with the NCC to obtain PI space, there ain't much difference > to becoming an LIR. There could be some difference in cost, but that > would only mean that as a small ISP it might be cheaper to get PI space. > Should we allow PI to be used to provide transit? If not, would you as an ISP build your network using PI? //per
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]