[address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

Wed Jan 16 15:54:44 CET 2008

On Jan 16, 2008 2:09 PM, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote:

[...]

> Not a bad proposal, but where does this actually differ from becoming
> a LIR, except for a change in minimum allocation sizes ?

This was the point I was trying to raise at the last RIPE meeting. I
think it may make sense to make a scalable policy that doesn't have a
distinction between LIRs and enterprises. The border between the two
is porous and a policy that doesn't assume LIRs being significantly
larger than enterprises may be called for.

I would suggest that instead of two policies we should have one.

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/vegoda-v6-policy.pdf

Thoughts?

Leo Vegoda