[address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed May 9 21:58:10 CEST 2007
On 9 May 2007, at 6:39pm, Andy Davidson wrote: >> >> If you have 1 zone to serve, and you request a PI block for that, >> I don't really see a real justification. > > What about if it's one very popular zone, and you want to get dns > for it topologically close to as many end users as possible ? > > There's nothing to stop you breaking off a bit of your PA and > getting that announced at lots of places where you host an anycast > instance, but now we're causing deaggregation. If you aren't the LIR then you probably need the agreement of the LIR before deaggregating their allocation. I suspect that lots of organisations would like to spread the DNS load but aren't LIRs. Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
- Next message (by thread): Fwd: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]